Sign in
Forgot password?
live chat off

Iraq

← The Perfect Athenian DemocracyThe Significance of the policies of US and UK →
Live Chat

Buy custom Iraq essay

Iraq is also identified as occupation of Iraq and is still taking place as the leaders of the powerful nation’s takes measure to control the war. The war started in March 2003 with attack of Iraq by an international force led by group from the United States and the United Kingdom.

Before the war started, the United States and UK (United Kingdom) argued that Iraq possessed all the dangers weapons i.e. weapons of mass destruction and this posed a threat to the rest of the world. It was also a threat to the security of the United States. In early 2002 the UNSC (United Nations Security Council) approved Resolution 1441 which ordered Iraq to totally collaborate with UN weapon supervisor to confirm that Iraq did not have any weapons of mass destruction and cruise arms. The UNMOVIC (United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission) did not see any proof, but could not confirm the correctness of Iraq's weapon affirmation (Vaughn, 2003).

The manger for inspecting dangerous weapons Hans Blix recommended the UN Security Council that as Iraq was collaborating in terms of access; Iraq's affirmation with regards weapons of mass destruction still could not be confirmed.

After all the investigation the United States declared that Iraq was a “weapons of mass destruction” free and they did not have any nuclear weapon. Some United States officials also blamed the president of Iraq Saddam Hussein of anchoring and supporting al-Qaeda, but no proof of a significant association was ever found. Other proclaim reasons for the attack comprised of Iraq's monetary support for the families of Palestinian terrorist bombers, Iraq administration human civil rights mistreatment, and an attempt to spread democratic system to the nation.

Main literature;

The war in Iraq is believed to have been started by president bush which he named as division of an "axis of wickedness" associated with terrorists and have dangerous to the rest of the world due to the possession of weapons of mass destruction. Bush sent his troop to Iraq to search for these nuclear weapons.  He later sent a one-page synopsis of the National Intelligence Estimate. People believes that Bush management manipulated or overstated the danger and proof of Iraq's WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) abilities or tried to build up a connection between Sadaam Hussein and the al Qaeda to suicide boomers and terrorist who carried out the September 11, 2001 assault and would finally become a main point of censure and argument for the President.

In early January 2007, all media station announced bush plan to send 21,542 more troop to Iraq. This was a program that took more than 2.2 billion dollars. Pressure on United States troops were compounded by the ongoing removal of British armed forces from the, British prime minister. The prime minister said that he was to order his own troop to protect Iraq.

According to Karl rove the leader political consultant to President Bush declared that bush invaded Iraq without good reasons. He said that bush could not have attacked Iraq since he knew very well that there were no weapons of mass destruction there. Bush made one mistake which was lying to people that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq thus sending more troops (Brannan, 2006). 

Many people have accused bush for Iraq war since he maintained that there were more weapons without having any proof and he send large troop who caused lots of peoples life.

In mid 2002 and 2003 Bush argued United Nations to put into effect disarmament permissions, precipitate a political disaster. During the inspection of mass destructive weapon, there was a contrivance. UN inspection troop left Iraq upon United States advisement and gave then five days to surrender all the weapons. This was previous to the United States attack. In spite of their requests to be given more time, four to five days to complete their mission, The United State did not give them the days instead authorized the use of armed force pursuant. This made them have various rivals who did cot complies with bush and Germany and France intervened. The United State dropped the proposal form UN support and started to prepare for war.

Majority of people were against bush actions and various leaders argued that for these measures Bush took, with his government, could be arraigned for war crimes. Kofi Annan in addition to leaders of a number of nations made the same statements, saying that the assault comprises a war crime.

According to Nathan, (2005) bush has all to be blamed for the Iraq war for the drastic measures he took. He stated that;

“In order to comply with the 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution by Congress, on March 18, 2003, President Bush certified to Congress that he had "determined that: (1) reliance by the United States on further diplomatic and other peaceful means alone will neither (A) adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq nor (B) likely lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq; and (2) acting pursuant to the Constitution and Public Law 107-243 is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001." (Nathan, 2005)

The unite states government tried all they could to pre-empt Iraqi WMD deployment and take away Saddam from authority. Their mission was accomplished as Baghad fell on April 2003. Bush affirmed the end of main battle operations. From his speech, everyone could tell that his mission has been accomplished. In the combat of Iraq, the United States and other associates had already succeeded (Pollack, 2006).

Despite bush victory of accomplishing the mission, the condition in Iraq deteriorated with some eyewitness arguing that the nation was on the edge of; if not already engage in, a situation of civil war. Bush's rules regarding worldwide terrorism and the war in Iraq met growing disapproval, with rising demands within the United States in 2007 to set a schedule to remove army from Iraq. Sectarian fighting and political stalemate in Iraq at the end of 2006 augmented negative thought of Bush's management and of the condition in Iraq.

Various studies have been done and all showed that more that 4,000 united solders were killed in the war while the amount of Iraq sufferers was unclear and could not be determined due to the high number of people killed. According to an Erives research (2008), the number of people who were killed in Iraq is estimated to be 655,975. All the fingers were pointed at bush for allowing such innocent people die in search for destructive weapons by force.

Having shattered lives, possessions and necessary civilian amenities in Iraq which the United States compromise will necessitate $51 billion to put back (predictable at $290 billion by Iraq, kill at least 222,000 people by terror campaign and lots of thousands more by diseases and hunger, the United States now seeks to manage Iraq financially even as its populace are dyeing of hunger and outbreak. injures, as well as fatalities in Iraq, systematically caused by the United states troops exceed all harm, fatalities and costs of all other revelry to the disagree combined many times over. compensation under these circumstances are an exaction of compliment for the defeater from a frantically deprived nation.

The United States want to force Iraq to pay Kuwait for any harm that was caused by the United States. They were also to pay United States expenses for its infringement of Iraqi sovereignty in inhabiting northern Iraq to additional influence the Kurdish inhabitants there. Such compensations are a neocolonial ways of expropriate Iraq's property especially oil, natural resources, and human being labor.

Bush violated and disregarded violations of human being rights, civil freedom and the united states Bill of human rights in order to attain its purpose of armed forces domination. Among the numerous violations that the US trooped or disregard by bush troop were the following

  • unlawful surveillance, taken into custody, questioning and harassment of Iraq-American, Arab-American and  Arabs;
  • unlawful detention, interrogation and handling of Iraqi captive for war;
  • assisting and condoning Kuwait abstract implementation, physical attack, torture and unlawful imprisonment of Palestinians and additional inhabitants in Kuwait after the United States occupation
  • Unnecessary, discriminatory, and extreme trial and sentence of U.S. forces personnel who decline to work in the Gulf, required thorough objector status or approve U.S. strategies.

People were murdered, battered, tormented, unlawfully detained and prosecuted, harassed and embarrassed as a result of these rules. The behavior goes against the, the Universal Declaration of human being Rights, Charter of the United Nations, rules of the United States and The Hague and Geneva gathering and the organization.

It is from time to time said that an assault would be defensible since Iraq’s refusal to permit arms assessment in line with safety Council Resolution 686, which ascertained a negotiating period at the end of the Gulf War in 1990. On the other hand the resolution did not make the negotiating period conditional on Iraq’s prospect collaboration with assessment; in its place it said that the safety Council chooses to stay seized to the issue and take more additional steps as might be essential for the accomplishment of current resolution and to protect peace and safety in the area. This appears to entail that one more Security Council declaration would be required to approve additional military action, and that has always been the situation taken by majority of intercontinental statesmen.  For example, French leader Jacques Chirac stated July 30 that an assault "can only be vindicated if it were determined on by the Security committee," and German Chancellor  Schroder said that there was going to be no hold up in Germany for a hit "with no endorsement of the  UN(United Nations)".

Bush government has equipped the ground for an assault by increasing a dissimilar justification. Bush also stated that an assault against Iraq was an act of self-defense. since there were lots of  new intimidation that the United States faced, it is asserted, an appropriate understanding of the right to self-defense should now expand to empower pre-emptive assault against possible attackers, preventing them doing anything or starting strikes against the United States  that may be shocking in their level and scope ( McNeeley, 2005)..

Bush is also accused to systematic denied necessary human requirements and services. To smash the will of the inhabitants, obliterate their financial capability, decreased their numbers and deteriorated their health. The United states also,

  • obligatory and enforced ban stopping the consignment of required medicines, water cleanser, newborn milk formula, foodstuff and other materials;
  • independently, without congressional power, prearranged a U.S. marine blockade of Iraq, an act of combat, to leave without the Iraqi people who needed materials;

froze finances of Iraq and enforced other countries to do so, depriving Iraq of the aptitude to acquire desirable medicines, foodstuff and other materials; 

Buy custom Iraq essay

Order Now
How will my paper lookRead More

Related essays

  1. The Significance of the policies of US and UK
  2. USA in Stress
  3. The Perfect Athenian Democracy
  4. US and Cuban Economy

EssaysService.com © 2017. All rights reserved.

contacts
live chat